HOME | DD
Yughues β Free Materials Pack #15 Redux
by
#flesh #ice #lava #moss #rock #stone
Published: 2011-07-26 10:00:33 +0000 UTC; Views: 20417; Favourites: 148; Downloads: 6736
Redirect to original
Description
CC-BY but it's not a big deal if you forget to credit me ; just be fair with me
Preview: youtu.be/qVrp2Q2aWSc
Related content
Comments: 62
Nobiax ... seriously ... am in LOOOVE WITH your Textures !!!! ... you'r soo generous .. merci pour tout . 
π: 0 β©: 1
the lava was so cool, in its liquid state and the red stuff was great for blood!
π: 0 β©: 1
Sorry, I meant Filter Forge.
It's a really nice tool for game artists, they bring good starting points for making some good textures, other are just perfect finished seamless textures. Have a look.
It's not free, but you can get it for free if you make good textures por people to download using the software.
[link]
π: 0 β©: 1
Neither!
Thanks but no thanks, Photoshop works very well (maybe even better).
I can't be on every "battlefields". ^^
If I were selling them maybe, but I don't so...
π: 0 β©: 0
The last one looks like extracted texture from Unreal Tournament 3 or one of Gears of War.
π: 0 β©: 1
Or Crysis 2 (from where I get this idea)
π: 0 β©: 0
It's really useful for beginner like me
π: 0 β©: 0
i'm new to all this, where do i plug the height into in the material editor in udk?
π: 0 β©: 1
Into the displacement, or something similar.
If there is nothing like that it's not a big deal
π: 0 β©: 0
Looking good, though I doubled the size, and tiled the lava/fire texture.
[link]
π: 0 β©: 1
Always love seeing your work.
π: 0 β©: 1
Sorry for venting on you, but why does most of the 3D industry think that .tga is somehow a superior format? Use .png, because not only it is loseless and supports 32 bits (just like .tga) but it is also great at compression (just tested it on a normalmap, .png is almost 4 times smaller than the same .tga) and it is more widely used (for example, I see thumbnails of .png in Explorer, but not .tga).
π: 0 β©: 2
I know it I used png for my first packages but it's a compressed format and you can compress it again.
Tga can be compressed easily.
But the main point is that Marmoset don't understand png ^^
and you can't save an alpha channel with png.
π: 0 β©: 2
Actually, PNG does support an alpha channel.
It also supports 16-bits-per-component if you want higher bit-depth, allows a user-specified gamma correction, etc.
[I've no idea what "Marmoset" is, or why it's important, though...]
π: 0 β©: 1
In a certain way yes,
but I'm talking about alpha channel & not transparency. PNG supports transparency but no alpha channel, there are only R, V & B channels. With TGA you can have RVB + alpha.
Like this you can decide to use or not the alpha channel, with PNG you don't have this possibility.
[Marmoset is a very simple software (just for render/preview) like UDK or CryEngine.]
π: 0 β©: 1
No, PNG supports a full alpha channel.
PNG has both "RGB" and "RGBA" modes; a "RGBA" PNG file has 8 bits of alpha per pixel (or 16 bits, if the file is in 16-bit-per-component mode).
[There's also a "transparent color" mode, in which a single color is "transparent" (alpha = 0). I agree, this feature isn't so useful, but that's OK, because you can use real alpha instead...]
π: 0 β©: 0
I think that it's better to have separate compressed images that one large archive. After all, if you really need to send one packed file, most of compressions have store setting that basically just joins the files.
[link]
You can save alpha and so much more.
π: 0 β©: 1
I don't
Too complicated for this.
For me :
{ (diffus+specular+bump(+height+glow)) = 1 texture = 1 folder } x5 because (I'm generous 
Doing it in your suggested way will give me a huge amount of link & that increase the probality of breaked links & the amount of work =/
Here I have one link which provides (in my mind) a real content.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, I wasn't suggesting that you rebuild your texture library, what I've meant was that if you store your textures in .png format you will be able to have 4 times more of them on the same hard drive.
π: 0 β©: 1
I've got it
I have still enough free space on my hard drive so it would be ok... for the moment
π: 0 β©: 0
Yeah, I agree, there seems little reason to use TGA other than for legacy software that doesn't support anything else. PNG is better in just about every way.
Hmm, well TGA does have one advantage -- it's very easy to write a small TGA decoder from scratch without libraries (whereas PNG is more complex, if for no other reason than it uses real compression). But that probably doesn't matter for most people...
π: 0 β©: 1
Legacy software... cancer, don't you think?
Well, if you ever need a lib-less solution for .png there is LodePNG .
π: 0 β©: 0
Haven't messed with 3d in awhile, but they're definitely going in my archive of stuff for when I do, thank you kindly!
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 0
The one at the bottom right corner, is supposed to be organic? Can't see it clearly...
π: 0 β©: 0
got the same for cinema 4d too ? or is that for C4d
π: 0 β©: 1
They are images so it works on C4d
π: 0 β©: 0
THX again for all the latest packs, they all look really great!
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>