HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS
| lingk99
# Statistics
Favourites: 436; Deviations: 64; Watchers: 177
Watching: 182; Pageviews: 29926; Comments Made: 2250; Friends: 182
# Comments
Comments: 285
Waratahra [2007-11-10 05:34:31 +0000 UTC]
Hey... Look who got featured in a news article, under the "Aries" section.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Astroluc [2007-05-15 20:50:48 +0000 UTC]
Thank you very much for the fave on pORtraItOftHeYOunGArTIStaTWoRK , I appreciate it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Saschaette [2007-02-21 18:10:00 +0000 UTC]
Hey long time no hear from, thanks for stopping by my page
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
adnrey [2006-12-25 07:51:41 +0000 UTC]
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
And creative successes!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
rnut [2006-10-10 08:57:51 +0000 UTC]
wow, you're amazing
soo good that i have to press the [watch this deviant] button
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
atobe [2006-05-22 03:03:04 +0000 UTC]
although lens are tools, just curious on your opnion on the 35/1.4 for outdoor fashion portraits? I'm considering this lens over the 85/1.2
Ray
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lingk99 In reply to atobe [2006-05-23 01:10:43 +0000 UTC]
For outdoors, all you need is a 35/2, unless you're trying to play with DOF on the 1.4. At 1.4, the 1.4L isn't as sharp as it should be, it definitely gives you some advantages in playing with DOF.
However, fashion, especially at 35, doesn't require shallow DOF. And if you were to shoot glamour, you wouldn't use a 35... you'd at least be at 50 or 85.
The 85/1.2 Mark II is an amazing lens, however I still like the 85/1.8 better for it's utility and it's smallness. It focuses faster than the 1.2 Mark I and it does a great job on DOF, especially if you're using a full frame camera. However, I know some people who swear by 85/1.2 II, because of it's ability to pick up a single subjecti n a crowd of people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
atobe In reply to lingk99 [2006-06-14 17:30:52 +0000 UTC]
Hmmm, interesting comments ! I spend too much time reading about lens than taking pix
I really liked the 85/1.8 but for some reason I sold it, looking to replace it but I'll probably end up buying it again, the 85/1.2 is pretty $ compared to the 85/1.8. I tried out the 50/1.4 but @ 1.4 the colour/contrast wasn't too impressive until it was stopped down to 2.8... 85/1.8 @ 1.8's pretty amazing, I think the main reason I sold it was cause on a 1.6x body it's too tight for indoors, now that I'm trying to shoot more outdoors the 85/1.8 fits perfectly
Oh well live and learn... heh
Raymond
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
N-Dr01d [2006-05-12 23:02:47 +0000 UTC]
Hmm you have a nice gallery, i should check it out sometime.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
xWANNAB3x [2006-04-20 12:19:41 +0000 UTC]
thanks for backing me up, now i dont feel so unwelcomed at this site
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
JessicaDru [2006-04-20 10:54:37 +0000 UTC]
Thank you so much for adding me to your watch list! I hope that you enjoy all of my gallery's newest additions. Hopefully i'll be posting some stock photos once Tristan get's me the disc. After that, I'll be working on my oil paintings until my broken foot heals (more info on that in my journal >_< ). Thanks again. <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
xxANGeLiCFRuiTCaKExx [2006-04-11 03:58:23 +0000 UTC]
You have some lovely work, beautiful portraits indeed. Thank you for stopping by my page and adding me to your friends list, also for giving Poetic Cider a , am really thrilled
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
boxedphotos [2006-04-11 01:54:26 +0000 UTC]
Thank you for the comment and fav on.
"Ck Model"
[link]
Glad you liked it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
atobe [2006-03-23 03:11:56 +0000 UTC]
oh man I love your site, I've got to start taking pix of girls
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
littlefirefly [2006-03-20 04:44:41 +0000 UTC]
Oh yeah by the way I amma
watch you back. Cuz yeah
you are one of those awesome
photo ppl (I dunno how to spell it) xP
And yeah. :}
Cuz I love lookin at photos more then
artworks soemtimes. :]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EyeThought [2006-03-17 22:31:42 +0000 UTC]
Thanks a bunch for the fav buddy! I'll return your comment shortly!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>