HOME | DD | Gallery | Favourites | RSS

| Scramblus

Scramblus [16200310] [] "Sasha"

# Statistics

Favourites: 22; Deviations: 4; Watchers: 3

Watching: 26; Pageviews: 6096; Comments Made: 1135; Friends: 26


# Comments

Comments: 242

NazzuraOne [2025-01-30 17:08:06 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Nacer223 [2023-08-24 18:27:03 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to Nacer223 [2023-08-24 18:43:08 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

TheQuelch [2021-10-06 15:09:45 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

UndeadDoktor [2019-02-07 19:42:08 +0000 UTC]

I Love you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to UndeadDoktor [2019-02-08 08:53:37 +0000 UTC]

.......

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wakaflockaflame1 [2016-06-30 22:40:56 +0000 UTC]

WEll lookie, zorana1.deviantart.com/

Another sock...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2016-07-01 10:13:26 +0000 UTC]

interesting, wonder who they are?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Scramblus [2016-07-01 11:48:30 +0000 UTC]

Brianna, clearly. Have you been on her page recently?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2016-07-01 11:56:02 +0000 UTC]

No, truth be told I don't really give her much thought. what makes you think it's 'her'?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Scramblus [2016-07-01 12:09:23 +0000 UTC]

You know how Brianna loves to, while stalking somebody, copy and paste her replies over and over again?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ReclusiveChicken [2016-06-20 07:42:43 +0000 UTC]

How's it going in the rice fields?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to ReclusiveChicken [2016-06-20 10:04:18 +0000 UTC]

?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ReclusiveChicken In reply to Scramblus [2016-06-20 10:27:22 +0000 UTC]

Y'know, the rice fields! Where capitalist exploitation thrives!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to ReclusiveChicken [2016-06-22 12:31:34 +0000 UTC]

Β ah right, well enough.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ReclusiveChicken In reply to Scramblus [2016-06-22 12:55:38 +0000 UTC]

I hear it's fun.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gdpr-20350176 [2016-05-23 17:32:37 +0000 UTC]

We need more unfiltered people like you around. Seriously, Fuck BriannaBater and her whole act.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Scramblus In reply to gdpr-20350176 [2016-06-04 12:01:26 +0000 UTC]

I use this profile to cut loose. She's bassically a posters child for the rot that's killed 3rd wave femminism and ensured 4th wave is stillborn.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

Saiyanstrong In reply to Scramblus [2018-08-30 07:23:08 +0000 UTC]

Oh thank God.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

gdpr-20350176 In reply to Scramblus [2016-06-04 16:51:43 +0000 UTC]

Decades from now, history classes will teach people about their entitlement. Just like they do with feudalism, colonialism, social Darwinism, segregation, homophobia...
God, people like her make third-wave feminism as extreme as they claim sexism to be.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to gdpr-20350176 [2016-06-06 14:14:54 +0000 UTC]

We haven't really got rid of at least 3 of those. The problem with 3rd wave is you're really talking aboiut several competing ideologies. Personally I always try to take a step back and note the oligarchic nature of modern society isnt really structed along gender/race/creed lines anymore.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-20350176 In reply to Scramblus [2016-06-07 15:50:03 +0000 UTC]

I mean yeah, but...3rd-wave extremists have the ideology that the biggest "victim" gets to be the biggest bully. Oh, and that women can only ever be victims to begin with.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to gdpr-20350176 [2016-06-09 11:41:24 +0000 UTC]

I'll be candid since that's what people respect. That's not really 3rd wave feminism, that's internet click bait garbage. The biggest problem Feminism has is online you have bad author after bad author, these are the one's who tend to pull in the crowds because of 'controversial' (it appeals to the weak-minded and pisses everyone else off) nature of their works. Take Anita Serkisian whose 3rd wave but writes at a High school level from a sex negative perspective school of thought, which means she neither she not only doesn't really represent feminism or women but she also doesn't even write very well .Β  She's been artificially supported by the media for a number of very complex reasons and her only public detractors with any clout are people who don't the academic chops to actually deconstruct her work (and trolls who she fiscally exploits). This creates a false image of her asΒ  THE Feminist gaming commentator when what she's actually a BAD feminist commentator.Β  Combined with the fact she only looks at gaming through a single very specific lens ensures she doesnt present anything resembling insight. This is basically internet feminism in a nutshell, I recently had a 4 page argument with a feminist 'journalist' which boiled down to her saying "anti-porn feminism is the only Feminism because I say so "while ignoring my observation that her stances whereΒ  empty rhetoric and irrelevant outside of her personal ivory tower.

If you're interested in a Femminist writer who isnt a cretin I'd recommend Lana K. She's pleasant, reasonable and isnt just attacking nerd counter culture to make a name for herself. (Or me I suppose, but than again I'm also a lot more things than Femminist. Labour party member, humanitarian, Kantian , Rug-muncher, huuuuuuuuge bitch etc etc. )

www.youtube.com/channel/UCxeNJ…

Seriously Lana's a fucking boss.
Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

gdpr-20350176 In reply to Scramblus [2016-07-09 23:36:10 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for clearing that up actually, you illustrate Feminism a lot better than most people I know could.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to gdpr-20350176 [2016-07-24 09:17:46 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, if there anything else you'd like to query?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to gdpr-20350176 [2016-05-24 14:31:11 +0000 UTC]

Indeed

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

missholder2203 [2016-04-03 11:45:23 +0000 UTC]

you are so rude to people just shut the hell up pls!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to missholder2203 [2016-04-04 12:28:20 +0000 UTC]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvdf5n…

So which hack are you upset on behalf off. I'm guessing axis powers weeaboo garbage from your page?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

missholder2203 In reply to Scramblus [2016-04-04 22:37:35 +0000 UTC]

well it's just rude you hoeΒ 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to missholder2203 [2016-04-05 08:20:25 +0000 UTC]

It also happens to be correct.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Scramblus [2016-05-08 22:58:56 +0000 UTC]

Don't mind me snooping, but what's this about...?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2016-05-10 09:56:23 +0000 UTC]

Squabbling nothing of note.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Scramblus [2016-05-11 09:15:05 +0000 UTC]

Meh, whatever you say.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2016-05-24 09:05:00 +0000 UTC]

Β I get salt on a fairly regular basis, it's not biggie.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Scramblus [2016-05-24 14:33:05 +0000 UTC]

Indeed, I know that feel.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2016-06-06 14:15:29 +0000 UTC]

Only the strong will survive.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Scramblus [2016-06-06 19:26:22 +0000 UTC]

Depends on what you mean by strong tho...

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

missholder2203 In reply to Scramblus [2016-04-05 11:46:48 +0000 UTC]

Β  Β  Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to missholder2203 [2016-04-07 07:10:45 +0000 UTC]

Β Hmmm, how old are you actually? I know you say you're 19 but looking at your style and temperment this is a lie (unless you have some sort of issue where you're less developed than the average 19 year old)

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

wakaflockaflame1 [2015-12-19 00:41:06 +0000 UTC]

And how have you been?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2015-12-19 16:31:11 +0000 UTC]

indomitable and snarky, you?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Scramblus [2015-12-20 02:07:24 +0000 UTC]

SJW triggering, ya know, same ol', by the way, there is someone I want you to meet.....theamericankaiser.deviantart.c…

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2015-12-23 11:45:26 +0000 UTC]

his art style is simplistic and derivative , but has potential once they shift beyond mimcry of their preferred anime's, looking at their profile I'd also suggest this person is too immersed in internet counter culture.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Scramblus [2015-12-23 20:45:01 +0000 UTC]

Heh. And he's the best SJW trigger I know~ A guy who doesn't give up logic in the name of "feelings" those Sjws have.....

Do you know a SJW on here called me a "privileged cis white male living in the US" despite me saying over and over, I'm an underprivileged, black, cis male father, living in the US? And they were one of that Briannabater chick's followers. *sigh* Now I'm sure I'm on some white girls shit list......well...none that I've dated anyways.....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2015-12-27 10:35:31 +0000 UTC]

hm yeah they're pretty annoying but are systematically isolating and censoring themselves not to mention the political backlash is building in the left and right.
Β Briannabaters just an attention whore, pretty much everything about her profile is suss, she's either faking huge chunks of info and events for self-publicity or she is Trolling for attention. Either way she's a weird damages mess of a human.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Scramblus [2015-12-29 04:41:53 +0000 UTC]

So true, so very true. Makes you wonder when human race went so wrong.....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2016-01-16 12:30:29 +0000 UTC]

It's inherant in our nature, truth be told it's always been fake. And Charlesncharge is almost certainly a troll account or sock puppet account.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Scramblus [2016-01-18 03:51:08 +0000 UTC]

Indeed...Hmmh, I had a feeling he might have been a fake also....mainly cause that brianna chick hasn't blocked him.....

Hey I got a new one for that list of yours....

flower2563.deviantart.com/

You wanna see some sexism against men, this girl spits it everywhere.....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Scramblus In reply to wakaflockaflame1 [2016-01-18 12:49:22 +0000 UTC]

I'm not seeing it, she just looks like a teenage girl who really likes the beatles.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

wakaflockaflame1 In reply to Scramblus [2016-01-18 22:23:02 +0000 UTC]

Do you really think I'd lie to you?

comments.deviantart.com/4/3114…
comments.deviantart.com/4/3114…
comments.deviantart.com/4/3114…
comments.deviantart.com/4/3114…
comments.deviantart.com/4/3114…
comments.deviantart.com/4/3114…

Oh and this is referring to her
comments.deviantart.com/4/2288…


She makes the UK look bad....and she's not the only one, I've dealt with two white knights of that Brianna chick....If you didn't exist, I'd think most women in the UK were man hating feminazis....

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>