BlauesSternWolf In reply to Tschandria [2023-04-07 17:18:38 +0000 UTC]

👍: 1 ⏩: 0

BlauesSternWolf In reply to Irbisty [2018-04-09 15:23:56 +0000 UTC]

I watched you over three weeks ago... T.T

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Irbisty In reply to BlauesSternWolf [2018-04-09 15:27:30 +0000 UTC]

Well, I could reply on it only now since I had too many notifications to come through, so I missed the moment. Sorry, buddy

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlauesSternWolf In reply to Irbisty [2018-04-10 01:56:06 +0000 UTC]

I've been inactive to avoid too many notifications. I've just been coming on more to take breaks from university courses. Although I've been looking at the Job Offers section in the forum lately, but no one ever responds to me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Irbisty In reply to BlauesSternWolf [2018-04-11 10:30:59 +0000 UTC]

Oh yes, I never had responses from the Job Offers forum section too. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlauesSternWolf In reply to Silvanoxia [2017-03-13 01:16:07 +0000 UTC]

I have a few photos you might find interesting. I wish they were better though since I was still new with my camera at the time and had no tripod or polarizer filter. These were on display in a hallway at college.
blauessternwolf.deviantart.com…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BlauesSternWolf In reply to Vefantur [2017-01-09 00:18:09 +0000 UTC]

Wonderful photos and really cool landscape to explore. Snow, mountains, and vast forests are things I don't have around here, nor things that I have ever seen in person unfortunately.
Also found it interesting you have a Pentax. I've been thinking of going Pentax for my next camera so it's cool to see more photos from one. I always hear it's not good for wildlife because the fast auto-focus is not there. Do you ever see wildlife when you're out shooting?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Vefantur In reply to BlauesSternWolf [2017-01-09 22:27:23 +0000 UTC]

I think now poor AF in Pentaxes is a myth. In my K-5II it works pretty well. I have old K-200 too, AF is much worse, but still camera takes nice pictures
If You want to take pictures of wildlife You need telephoto lens which usually is very demanding for AF system. So, for sure quite cheap telephoto zoom (like my 55-300) is not ideal for wildlife. But it is problem in all systems, for lenses with high focal length AF works well only in expensive and bright ones But still, it is possible to take nice picture for example of bird with a cheap telephoto
In my opinion Pentaxes are great for outdoor shooting. Cameras are small, usually weathersealed (which is very rare and very useful) and well designed

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BlauesSternWolf In reply to Vefantur [2017-01-17 01:18:45 +0000 UTC]

My camera came with a free 75-300mm which starts at ƒ/4 but has no image stabilizer and 300mm is very sensitive to movement. I think I'd rather be using the Pentax 55-300mm, wider zoom range is convenient and the Pentax lens is weather resistant. My lens is about half the price though, the ones with image stabilizers are doubled in price, making them about equivalent. The trade offs might be minor.
I was recently looking up Pentax lenses and more about the K-70. Whenever and if ever I have the money, I'm going to go with the K-70 next. Weather-sealing was what originally got me interested in Pentax, there is the Canon 7D MkII, but it costs two to three times as much as the K-70. Then getting the K-70 with the 18-135mm lens makes the deal even better since it reduces the lens price, and I want a 18-135mm lens. So the K-70 is speaking to me from all directions, even the little things like the red screen mode to keep your eyes dilated at night. Or I could start my Pentax journey with a used K-50.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1